Answers
Straight answers on proving records
The questions auditors, regulators, and engineers actually ask — answered honestly, with independently verifiable evidence you can produce yourself. Each answer shows what a tamper-evident, cryptographically anchored receipt does, and, just as clearly, what it doesn't.
How do I create verifiable evidence for an EU AI Act Article 50 audit?
A self-written log proves nothing to a regulator. What tamper-evident, independently verifiable Article 50 evidence looks like — and how to produce it.
Read the answer →Do AI chatbots have to disclose they're AI under Article 50 — and how do you prove it?
Article 50(1) makes you disclose your chatbot is AI. Proving you disclosed — at the time, in that exact form — is the part an auditor tests. How to produce evidence anyone can verify.
Read the answer →How do I mark AI-generated content under Article 50(2) — and prove the marking held?
Watermarks and C2PA apply the mark; an anchored receipt proves it was applied at generation — even if the mark is later stripped or the claim is disputed.
Read the answer →What evidence should I keep for deepfake disclosure under Article 50(4)?
Deepfakes and public-interest AI text get contested, taken down, or litigated. How to keep independently verifiable proof you disclosed at publication.
Read the answer →How do I give an AI agent a tamper-evident receipt for an action it took?
Audit every call — but a log you control isn't verifiable at handoff. How to issue receipts for agent tool calls, outputs, and handoffs that anyone can check.
Read the answer →What gives me verifiable records evidence for DORA and 21 CFR Part 11?
Both turn on one question: can you prove your records weren't altered? How to produce integrity evidence an examiner can verify independently.
Read the answer →How do I give an AI agent a verifiable, tamper-evident receipt of what it did?
Mint a cryptographically anchored receipt of an agent action over the LAIN MCP server — one anyone can verify free. It proves the action's existence and integrity, not that the work was correct.
Read the answer →How can an AI agent prove a document or claim existed at a specific time?
Hash the content and call evidence.verify — you get an anchored existence-at-time receipt. Only the hash leaves your machine, and any later change to the content breaks verification.
Read the answer →How should an agent resolve a confidence gap before a consequential action?
Call resolve_confidence for independently verifiable evidence plus a disclosed, recomputable confidence — evidence you can check, not a number you must trust.
Read the answer →How can an autonomous agent pay for verified data inline over HTTP, no human checkout?
Discover priced work at the blocker feed, then pay in USDC on the Base network over HTTP x402 — evidence releases only against a settled payment.
Read the answer →How do AI agents produce independent provenance and transparency evidence?
Mint anchored agent-run receipts over the MCP server; anyone verifies them free. Independent of this network's availability — proving existence and integrity, not truth.
Read the answer →How can an AI agent check a recall and return a citation that holds up to audit?
Route the agent to answer.record-search over FDA recall and enforcement data, then anchor the cited answer into an independently verifiable receipt.
Read the answer →